Ceramics and Kilns

Mingei and the Folk Craft Movement

The twentieth-century mingei idea that plain, everyday objects made by anonymous craftspeople hold deep beauty, with its origins, ideals, kiln villages and critics.

On this page
  1. What mingei means
  2. Origins in the 1920s
  3. The core ideas
  4. Pottery and the kiln villages
  5. A paradox of anonymity
  6. Influence and legacy
  7. Looking at a mingei-style piece

What mingei means

Mingei is a word made from min (people) and gei (craft), usually translated as “folk craft” or “people’s art.” It refers both to a kind of object and to a movement. The objects are everyday things such as bowls, jars, textiles, baskets and furniture, made by hand for ordinary use, often in rural workshops. The movement was a twentieth-century effort to argue that such things deserve admiration alongside famous paintings and refined court art.

Origins in the 1920s

The idea is most closely associated with the philosopher and critic Yanagi Soetsu, who with potter friends, including Hamada Shoji and Kawai Kanjiro, helped to form and popularize the term in the mid-1920s. They traveled widely, visiting kiln villages and country markets and collecting objects that nobody had thought to treat as art. Yanagi had earlier developed an interest in the pottery of Korea’s Joseon dynasty, which he saw as a model of unselfconscious beauty. A Japan Folk Crafts Museum opened in Tokyo in the 1930s to display this kind of material.

The timing is important. Japan had gone through rapid industrialization since the Meiji modernization of the late nineteenth century, and factory goods were replacing many local handmade items. Mingei can be read partly as a response to that change, a call to look again at what was being lost.

The core ideas

Supporters of the movement tended to describe good folk craft in similar terms.

  • Usefulness. An object is made to be used, and its beauty grows out of that use rather than being added on top.
  • Anonymity. Ideal folk objects were made by unknown craftspeople who did not sign their work or seek fame.
  • Plainness and honesty. Materials and technique are straightforward, without showy decoration.
  • Repetition and humility. Skill built up through making the same form many times could produce natural confidence in the result.
  • Local materials and tradition. Regional clay, fibers, dyes and forms gave objects their character.

There is a link to the aesthetic of wabi-sabi, which also values modest and aged things, though the two ideas have different histories. Mingei grew out of a specific modern debate about industry, art and everyday life.

Pottery and the kiln villages

Ceramics were central to mingei. Potters and collectors paid attention to places that made practical wares, such as Mashiko, Onta and Tobe, and to storage jars and tableware from older kilns. Hamada, for instance, worked in Mashiko and combined local clay and glazes with a broad range of influences. Wares in a mingei spirit often have thick, dark glazes, brushwork in simple patterns, and sturdy forms. Dishes in a mingei style are still made today, and many appear in modern discussions about choosing everyday tableware.

Other crafts were included too: indigo-dyed cloth, bamboo baskets, woodwork and paper. Indigo dyeing and other regional textile traditions found new admirers through the movement.

A paradox of anonymity

Critics, both at the time and later, have noted several tensions. Several key figures were highly educated, well-known artists who chose a simple style. Their own pots were signed and sold as art. The ideal of the anonymous craftsperson could also overlook the real people, often poor, who made those objects, and their wishes. Some scholars also argue that “folk” was something defined from outside, by urban intellectuals who selected which rural goods counted. Others point out that the movement could treat tradition as fixed, though craft traditions have always changed.

These critiques do not erase the movement’s influence. They suggest instead that mingei is best understood as a particular modern viewpoint, not a neutral description of how traditional makers saw their own work.

Influence and legacy

Mingei affected Japanese design, museum collecting and the way many people shop for crafts. It helped protect local workshops, encouraged regional revivals and shaped the view that a well-made everyday cup is worth thinking about. Its ideas also traveled abroad and influenced studio pottery in other countries, especially through potters who visited and exchanged ideas with its members.

The movement also left a vocabulary: words like yo no bi, roughly “beauty of use,” are still used when people talk about functional crafts. At the same time, contemporary makers do not always follow the original rules. Many sign their work, experiment with form, and sell in galleries, while still caring about use.

Looking at a mingei-style piece

When you encounter a bowl or jar described as mingei, a few questions are worthwhile. Is the form shaped by the hand and the job it does? Is the decoration restrained or confident rather than fussy? Does it feel right to use? The answers will not fit every piece, but the questions come close to what the movement was trying to teach: slow attention to ordinary things.

The complete guide to ceramics and kilns

Japanese Ceramics: Kilns, Clays and Regional Traditions
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →